From Conservative Daily News via Conservative Commune:
As bad as the asinine statement made by Missouri Senate candidate, Todd Akin was, this statement by The US Attorney General is far worse;
Holder said: “Let’s be frank, much of the anthropological data [the Justice Department] has acquired concludes that people of certain ethnicities are simply biologically incapable of obtaining voter identifications.”
So Eric Holder thinks Black people and Hispanics are too stupid to acquire a photo ID. That’s an interesting theory that hasn’t made it to the main stream media yet.
Another faux paux by Holder at the same hearing;
“It’s a simple matter of respect. Either we can honor the traditions of ethnicities in the U.S. who have no historical cultural demand they prove who they are, or we can take a step back to the days of Jim Crow and force people who have no familiarity with proving who they are to do so in a most uncomfortable setting [voting]. After all, this is America; we’re founded on ‘inclusion;’ on making people from other nations and cultures feel comfortable. How else can we achieve that unless we allow Hispan … I mean, uhh, ‘people’ to practice the traditions of the native lands they came from? Anything less would be discriminatory.” [emphasis mine]
How else can the Obama administration steal the election if people have to show an ID to vote?
Well, at least the fool is telling the truth for a change and letting us all know exactly what he and his cohorts really think. Since day one I’ve been saying that to uphold this idea of voter ID being discriminatory is the most vile discrimination of all. And, let’s face it – if someone is really too stupid to get an ID, they shouldn’t be voting.
Then that same data supports the assertion that they should be disqualified to vote. I’m sorry, but that is the logical conclusion of such a statement.
NOTE: before anyone attacks me for being racist, please stow it. You need to take it up with Holder. He’s the one who advanced the same old Progressive line of “blacks are inferior,” so, if anyone is racist here, it’s Holder. After all, the notion of racial inferiority is nothing new: it’s been a part of Liberal/Progressive doctrine since at least the time of Woodrow Wilson.
In order to keep the majority of Blacks on the “plantation”, the Progressives have had to garner the support of a few Blacks to make it seem like it’s the fault of Conservatives that they are still living in poverty and are under educated, ect. People like Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson and Eugene Robinson fit the bill quite nicely. They are morally and ethically challenged individuals.
Agreed.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
This is satire, right?
Afraid not, my friend.
Nice one, Mr G.
That a public official, appointed or otherwise, could say such things in our country today and not be run out of town is amazing…and sad.
I’ll have to use that first Holder quote sometime: that’s a keeper.
Pingback: Teeing it up: A Round at the LINKs (Romney’s “extreme positions” edition) | SENTRY JOURNAL