The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s second amended complaint in his chock full of self-conradictary nonsense. For example, in paragraphs 99 and 100 he whines about having the FBI sicked on him by some of the defendants, but in paragraph 189 he claims to have been retaliated against by same defendants because he was talking to law enforcement.
Yep. TDPK wants the court to believe that the defendants harassed him by sending the cops to his house while simultaneously retaliating against him for talking to the cops. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Supreme Court precedents require that a complaint be plausible in order to survive a motion to dismiss.